UK Revenue98.7Index−1.3%UK Covers94.8Index−5.2%UK Spend104.1Index+4.1%UK Premium CasualRev YoY−0.9%London Premium CasualRev YoY+3.1%Manchester Premium CasualRev YoY−2.8%North West Premium CasualRev YoY−1.6%UK Destination RestaurantsRev YoY+1.1%UK Fine DiningRev YoY+4.4%UK Casual DiningRev YoY−3.7%Scotland Premium CasualRev YoY+2.2%South West Casual DiningRev YoY−4.1%

Markets

RMI Restaurant Market Index

A view of restaurant trading conditions built from participating operators rather than sentiment surveys. Coverage expands as the participant network grows, and markets are published only once sample sufficiency is met.

UK Restaurant Revenue

98.7−1.3% YoY

Rebased, 100 = prior year

UK Restaurant Covers

94.8−5.2% YoY

Rebased, 100 = prior year

UK Restaurant Spend

104.1+4.1% YoY

Rebased, 100 = prior year

Figures shown on this page are illustrative of the reporting format while the RMI participant network is being established.

Market detail

Segment and city level reporting

Each published market carries its participating sample, the number of contributing ownership groups and a data confidence indicator. Markets below threshold are withheld.

RMI market movement by market and segment
MarketSegmentRevenue YoYCovers YoYSpend YoYSampleConfidence
UK Premium CasualPremium Casual−0.9%−4.8%+4.1%186High
London Premium CasualPremium Casual+3.1%−1.9%+5.1%24High
Manchester Premium CasualPremium Casual−2.8%−6.4%+3.9%42High
North West Premium CasualPremium Casual−1.6%−5.2%+3.8%63High
UK Destination RestaurantsDestination Restaurant+1.1%−3.8%+5.1%22Medium
UK Fine DiningFine Dining+4.4%+0.2%+4.2%28Medium
UK Casual DiningCasual Dining−3.7%−7.1%+3.7%94High
Scotland Premium CasualPremium Casual+2.2%−2.6%+4.9%18Medium
South West Casual DiningCasual Dining−4.1%−7.8%+4.0%14Developing

Reporting periods

Daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly

Participating operators receive daily and weekly benchmarks. Monthly and quarterly market reviews are produced for management and board reporting, with annual market reports as coverage matures.

Revisions are published transparently: where a participant resubmits corrected data, the affected benchmark periods are restated and marked as revised.

Market coverage grows with participation

Additional participating restaurants improve sample sufficiency, which strengthens benchmarks and extends the markets RMI can publish.